A Willful Woman…

Thoughts about books from a romance addict.

Rant: The Highest Stakes of All by Sara Craven

on September 27, 2013

Those who know me well know I sometimes like to kick it old skool. But as I read The Highest Stakes of All and skimmed around — because I also like to do that — I started to feel uneasy. There’s “old skool” and then there’s “what the hell is this?”  Even for a Sara Craven hero, this guy seemed extra rapey with potential slaver sauce on top — he not only essentially buys the heroine from her father, but he actually threatens to resell her to someone else when he’s done with her. Okay, there’s a line even a dark romance hero should not cross and unapologetically selling people as sex slaves is definitely on the other side of it. 

Then I happened to see this on an inner page at the beginning of the book:

Harlequin Presents is pleased to present this new and exciting miniseries!

The Untamed

Arrogant and proud, unashamedly male!

HarlequinPresents with a retro twist…

Step back in time to when men were men — and women knew just how to tame them!

[For those not in the known, that would be by turning out to be virgins instead of sluts. And developing Stockholm Syndrome on cue.]

It’s totally hypocritical of me, but wow did that put me off.  Of course category authors have always written to suit the market — and it’s not that there’s anything wrong with that! Naturally authors want to sell their books. And Harlequin has always been very deliberate about targeting its audiences, which is why it has so many different lines. (And for a time, had such blatantly — if not always reliably — descriptive titles.) That’s what Harlequin does.  Considering my brand loyalty to Harlequin Presents, I can’t argue with it as a tactic.

But like this book’s hero, this promotion seems a step beyond. For one thing, it’s kind of insulting to both women and men. I know there are readers who genuinely do believe that old skool romance heroes were “real men” and thus more interesting, but most of us would not touch one with a ten foot pole wrapped in a ten foot condom in real life. And we’re glad to know men who are unashamedly not assholes.

And calling our beloved books “retro,” as if they’re some hip, ironic thing… that grates my cheese. I’m not saying I never read Harlequin Presents ironically, because sometimes they’re just damn funny.  But that’s not something I plan — it’s something that just happens. When the The Unfeasibly Tall Billionaire… appeared,  I most loved the chapters that conveyed a sense of genuine affection for the line.  Kind of like my love/hate relationship with the books of Penny Jordan.

The promotion also doesn’t appear to be very effective. Not only does this book have less than a 3 star overall rating — with 40% 1-2 stars — but many reviewers found it not only offensive but boring on top of it. And there is no worse crime for a Harlequin Presents.

I suspect most of these readers sensed the essential insincerity of this book — that it was being deliberately written to try to appeal to them instead of somehow having that magic chemistry that results in reader consent to serious whatthefuckery. You can’t bottle that stuff. And you can’t write it on demand.


6 responses to “Rant: The Highest Stakes of All by Sara Craven

  1. Ros says:

    I have a pretty high tolerance for Harlequin Presents alph-hole heroes. I'll even admit that Lynne Graham is like crack to me, and her heroes often skim dangerously close to the rapey line. But Sara Craven is the only one (so far) who is off my reading list for good, since I read The Innocent's Surrender a few years ago. Kidnapped and raped, emotionally blackmailed and incarcerated – that heroine was abused in every imaginable way. The thing which the hero apologises for? Taking her virginity. It was truly horrid. I reviewed it here: http://myromancereviews.wordpress.com/2010/02/04/the-innocents-surrender/I liveblogged one of those retro romances. It was by Sandra Marton who I normally quite like, but this was utterly ridiculous. It involved actual timetravel back to the 1970s, which, if you're going to travel through time, has to be the most disappointing place to end up.

  2. willaful says:

    LOL, too true! Though there was a wonderful British t.v. show about that very topic. Part of the point of it was how ghastly the time was, though.Marton is one of my favs, but I've avoided that one because I'm not fond of time travel romance at the best of times. This Craven book was also set in the 1970s, which I guess is supposed to make all this stuff safely in the past and thus okay. *fail*

  3. The mini series was inspired by Life on Mars. Is that the TV show you were thinking of?

  4. My impression is that this mini-series wasn't a great success. According to the Romance Wiki it's only three books long. Quite a while ago I took a look at Susan Stephens' contribution to it. After what you've said here, I'm really glad i missed out on reading the one by Sara Craven.

  5. willaful says:

    Oh, that one was ghastly. I did catch the "Life on Mars" influence (and "Mad Men") influence there, but they didn't help. 😉 I hadn't realized it was the same series as this, though I should have,

Comments welcome! But FYI, WordPress has extremely good spam filters.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Something More

my extensive reading

Blue Castle Considerations

thoughtations, contemplations, fulminations & other random things from books...

...Burns Through Her Bookshelf

Voracious reader, book lover, spastic blogger, audiologist. These things are some of me, but not the sum of me.

Queer Romance Month

because love is not a subgenre

Cate Marsden.

Love and Zombies. And books. And infrequent updates.

Book Thingo

Reading (mostly) romance books down under


...barely skimming the surface

Olivia Dade

Sex. Banter. Nerdery. Love.

Flight into Fantasy

Romance, speculative fiction, and YA book reviews, book chatter, and random silliness

Her Hands, My Hands

The vagaries of my mind, the products of my hands. Not always safe for work.


64 books. 1 Champion. Get your game on.

Stop the STGRB Bullies

Your hypocrisy is showing

Blue Moon

Audiobook reviews and book reviews. Occasional opining.

Miss Bates Reads Romance

Miss Bates is Austen's loquacious spinster in Emma. No doubt Miss Bates read romances ... here's what she would've thought of them.

%d bloggers like this: